Publication Ethics

Resocia: International Journal of Applied Research and Innovation is committed to upholding the highest standards of integrity, transparency, and ethical responsibility in scholarly publishing. The journal adheres to the principles and best practices established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and expects all parties involved in the publication process—including authors, editors, reviewers, and the publisher—to comply with these ethical standards throughout all stages of manuscript submission, peer review, and publication.

1. Responsibilities of Authors

Authors are required to ensure that all submitted manuscripts are original works, accurately reported, and properly cited in accordance with accepted academic standards. Any form of plagiarism, self-plagiarism, data fabrication, data falsification, or redundant publication is strictly prohibited. Authors must present their research findings honestly and transparently, provide sufficient methodological detail to enable verification or replication, and disclose any potential conflicts of interest, whether financial, institutional, or personal. Authorship should accurately reflect significant intellectual or practical contributions to the research. Manuscripts must not be under consideration by, or previously published in, another journal at the time of submission.

2. Responsibilities of Editors

Editors are responsible for evaluating submitted manuscripts in a fair, objective, and timely manner, based solely on their scholarly merit, originality, clarity, and relevance to the journal’s focus on applied research and innovation across diverse disciplines. Editors must maintain the confidentiality of all submitted materials and ensure that information related to manuscripts is disclosed only to individuals directly involved in the editorial and peer-review process. Editorial decisions must be free from discrimination, personal bias, or conflicts of interest and must consistently uphold ethical principles that support research integrity and responsible academic publishing.

3. Responsibilities of Reviewers

Reviewers are expected to conduct peer reviews objectively, constructively, and within the agreed timeframe to support the improvement of manuscript quality. All manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents and must not be used for personal or professional advantage. Reviewers should identify and report any ethical concerns—such as suspected plagiarism, redundant publication, unethical research practices, or undisclosed conflicts of interest—to the editors. Reviewers who feel unqualified to assess a manuscript or unable to provide an impartial evaluation should promptly decline the review invitation.

4. Responsibilities of the Publisher

The publisher, in collaboration with the editorial board, is responsible for ensuring that all publication practices comply with ethical standards and COPE guidelines. This responsibility includes addressing ethical complaints, investigating allegations of academic misconduct, and implementing appropriate corrective actions, such as issuing corrections, retractions, or expressions of concern when necessary. The publisher supports the editorial team in promoting transparency, accountability, and fairness throughout the editorial and publication process.