Structural Feasibility Analysis of PT Phapros Building Subjected to Additional Machinery Loads

Authors

  • Ilham Nadhif Pratama Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang Author
  • Muhammad Rizal Ramli Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang Author
  • Antonius Antonius Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang Author
  • Lisa Fitriyana Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65310/ae5c5468

Keywords:

structural feasibility, additional machinery load, existing building, seismic performance, reinforced concrete.

Abstract

This study evaluates the structural feasibility of Building H at PT Phapros Tbk Semarang under existing conditions and after the planned addition of machinery loads. The assessment combined visual inspection, non-destructive testing using Rebound Hammer, Rebar Detector, Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity, carbonation testing, and structural analysis using ETABS. Structural performance was evaluated according to SNI 2847:2019, SNI 1726:2019, and SNI 1727:2020. The results show that the existing concrete condition was generally adequate, while structural deficiencies were identified in several critical components. Inter-story drift in the upper stories exceeded the allowable limit, indicating insufficient seismic performance. Beam sections generally satisfied flexural requirements, although several support regions were inadequate in shear. The columns did not satisfy the Strong Column–Weak Beam requirement and showed deficiencies in flexural, shear, and confinement performance. After the addition of machinery loads, column axial and bending demands increased considerably, while the maximum slab moment increased from 6.44 to 18.58 kN·m but remained below its reduced flexural capacity of 37.09 kN·m. Structural strengthening, particularly of the column system, is required before the additional machinery is permanently installed.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alakbar, A. M. F., Hastono, K. B., & Zuraidah, S. (2024). Perbandingan antara metode static equivalent dan response spectrum pada perencanaan Gedung Asrama Universitas Dr. Soetomo menggunakan Sistem Rangka Pemikul Momen Khusus (SRPMK). Publikasi Riset Orientasi Teknik Sipil (Proteksi), 6(2), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.26740/proteksi.v6n2.p118-126

Antonius. (2021). Perilaku dasar dan desain beton bertulang berdasarkan SNI 2847:2019. Tim Unissula Press.

Ariadi, D. (2016). Respon struktur akibat beban seismik pada gedung dengan model penampang struktur kolom tak seragam. Kurva S: Jurnal Keilmuan dan Aplikasi Teknik Sipil, 4(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.31293/teknikd.v4i3.5544

Ashraf, W. (2016). Carbonation of cement-based materials: Challenges and opportunities. Construction and Building Materials, 120, 558–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.080

Asroni, A. (2010). Balok dan pelat beton bertulang (1st ed.). Graha Ilmu.

Athallah, F. I., & Aryanata, R. (2023). Evaluasi struktur bangunan gedung bertingkat eksisting: Studi kasus Gedung Bea Cukai Semarang [Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung]. https://repository.unissula.ac.id/28526/

Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2019a). SNI 2847:2019: Persyaratan beton struktural untuk bangunan gedung dan penjelasan. https://pesta.bsn.go.id/produk/detail/12731-sni28472019

Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2019b). SNI 1726:2019: Tata cara perencanaan ketahanan gempa untuk struktur bangunan gedung dan nongedung. https://pesta.bsn.go.id/produk/detail/12762-sni17262019

Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2020). SNI 1727:2020: Beban desain minimum untuk perancangan bangunan gedung dan struktur lainnya. https://pesta.bsn.go.id/produk/detail/12927-sni17272020

Computers and Structures, Inc. (2023). CSI analysis reference manual. Computers and Structures, Inc. https://docs.csiamerica.com/manuals/etabs/Analysis%20Reference.pdf

Daniel, S. L. (1991). Structures. Eresco.

Imran, I., & Hendrik, F. (2014). Perencanaan lanjut struktur beton bertulang (Vol. 1, 1st ed.). ITB.

Iswandi, I., Irfan, M., & Rakhmadi, A. (2009). Baja tulangan sebagai salah satu faktor penentu keberhasilan rancang bangunan beton bertulang tahan gempa. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Besi Baja (SNBB 2009).

Karisoh, P. H., Dapas, S. O., & Pandaleke, R. E. (2018). Perencanaan struktur gedung beton bertulang dengan Sistem Rangka Pemikul Momen Khusus. Jurnal Sipil Statik, 6(6), 361–372. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v2/index.php/jss/article/view/19859

Manoppo, J. B. A., Sumajouw, M. D. J., & Handono, B. D. (2023). Perencanaan ulang struktur bangunan gedung kelas 5 lantai di Politeknik Pelayaran Sulawesi Utara. TEKNO, 21(83). https://doi.org/10.35793/jts.v21i83.47499

Masdar, A., Pratiwi, Y., Masdar, A. D., & Noviarti. (2024). Penilaian kelayakan struktur Gedung Kuliah Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Payakumbuh. Jurnal Teknik Sipil Institut Teknologi Padang, 11(2), 138–143. https://doi.org/10.21063/jts.2024.V1102.0138-143

Pamungkas, A., & Harianti, E. (2013). Desain pondasi tahan gempa (S. Suryantoro, Ed.). Andi.

Purwono, R. (2005). Perencanaan struktur beton bertulang tahan gempa (4th ed.; S. Adriono, Ed.). ITS Press.

Sari Anggreini, N., & Priantoro Machmoed, S. (2024). Perencanaan struktur beton bertulang Gedung Hotel Delmare 10 lantai tahan gempa dengan sistem ganda di Kota Mataram. Axial: Jurnal Rekayasa dan Manajemen Konstruksi, 12(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.30742/axial.v12i1.3371

Sulistyono, A., Solikin, M., & Qomarun. (2022). Evaluasi keandalan bangunan Gedung Pertemuan Sasana Manggala Sukowati dan Gedung Kartini: Studi kasus gedung pertemuan di bawah pengelolaan Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Sragen. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknik Sipil UMS, 158–165. https://proceedings.ums.ac.id/sipil/article/view/947

Tuwanakota, E., & Banten, C. P. (2021). Analisis kekuatan struktur berdasarkan respon spektrum terhadap gaya gempa yang akan datang di Kota Sorong. Jurnal Karkasa, 7(2), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.32531/jkar.v7i2.423

Wibowo, W., Safitri, E., & Putri, D. (2020). Kajian karbonasi pada beton mutu tinggi memadat mandiri dengan variasi komposisi metakaolin. Jurnal Riset Rekayasa Sipil, 4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.20961/jrrs.v4i1.44632

Yahya, P. A., Adhitama, F., Pradipta, B., & Setiyawan, P. (2022). Asesmen dan analisa gedung eksisting: Studi kasus Bangunan Johar Shopping Center Semarang. Jurnal Ilmiah Sultan Agung, 176–204. https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/JIMU/article/view/26765

Downloads

Published

2026-07-23

How to Cite

Structural Feasibility Analysis of PT Phapros Building Subjected to Additional Machinery Loads. (2026). International Journal of Applied Research and Innovation, 1(3), 137-147. https://doi.org/10.65310/ae5c5468