Institutional Deadlock and Strategic Execution of Islamic Banking Disputes in Indonesia: A Post-Constitutional Court Decision No. 93/PUU-X/2012 Juridical-Financial Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65310/ckb0w741Keywords:
Absolute Competence, Efficiency Structure Hypothesis, Institutional Deadlock, Islamic Banking, Legacy Assets.Abstract
Constitutional Court Decision No. 93/PUU-X/2012 promotes an epistemological reconstruction of Sharia economic jurisdiction by affirming the absolute jurisdiction of the Religious Courts. However, this integration faces systemic obstacles when it intersects with the acceleration of corporate actions, such as mergers and spin-offs, which leave administrative residues on collateral assets. This study aims to analyze the dissonance between jurisdictional certainty, judicial digitization, and the rigidity of administrative bureaucracy in the execution of collateral following the consolidation of Islamic banking. The method employed is normative legal research using an interdisciplinary approach through Institutional Theory and the Efficiency Structure Hypothesis (ESH). The analysis focuses on the friction between formal rules and informal constraints in handling legacy assets. The results reveal a “Digitalization Paradox,” wherein the efficiency of e-litigation does not align with the effectiveness of physical enforcement. The primary issue lies in the institutional rigidity of agencies such as the National Land Agency (BPN) and the National Property Management Agency (KPKNL) in enforcing assets due to discrepancies in creditor identities. Debtors exploit this gap through third-party objections to delay auctions. Consequently, transaction costs rise, disrupting the efficiency and liquidity stability of Islamic banking. Therefore, regulatory synchronization and strengthened governance are necessary to ensure legal certainty and system efficiency.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, L., & Ahmad, J. (2026). Arbitration in Islamic Banking Disputes: Legal-Economic Implications for Enhancing Financial Stability and Governance. Sarhad Journal of Legal Studies, 2(01), 01-15.
Ahmed, H. (2011). Product Development in Islamic Banks: Integrating Economics, Finance and Legal Aspects. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748641741.001.0001
Al-Deek, M. Y. (2025). Liquidity Risk in Islamic Banking: Structural Challenges and Shariah-Compliant Mitigation Strategies. Suhuf: International Journal of Islamic Studies, 37(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.23917/suhuf.v37i2.13223
Amarini, I., Indriati, N., & Budiarto, A. (2023). Digital Transformation: Creating an Effective and Efficient Court in Indonesia. Jurnal Legality, 31(2), 241–257.
Baihaki, A., & Prasetya, M. R. B. (2021). Kewenangan Absolut Pengadilan Agama Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012. Krtha Bhayangkara, 15(2), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v15i2.1122
Berger, A. N. (1995). The profit-structure relationship in banking--tests of market-power and efficient-structure hypotheses. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 27(2), 404-431. https://doi.org/10.2307/2077876
Burnes, B. (2017). Managing Change (7th ed.). Pearson.
Firdaus, A. F. N., Aina, I., Ridhotullah, M. V., & Sinwani. (2025). Problematika Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan dalam Perbankan Syariah Terhadap Efektifitas Pasal 20 UUHT. Jurnal Media Akademik, 3(6). https://doi.org/10.62281/v3i6.2169
Gümüşay, A. A., Meyer, R. E., & Höllerer, M. A. (2025). Committed actors, institutional complexity, and pathways to compromise: The emergence of Islamic banking in Germany. Journal of management studies, 62(1), 408-445. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13061
Kadi, S. (2025). Accounting and legal disputes in Islamic banking and finance. Journal of Islamic Economic Laws, 8(01), 19-40. https://doi.org/10.23917/jisel.v8i01.6915
Kamil, A., & Fauzan, M. (2004). Ke Arah Pembaruan Hukum Acara Perdata Dalam SEMA dan PERMA. Sinar Grafika.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2022). Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 7 Tahun 2022 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 tentang Administrasi Perkara dan Persidangan di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik. JDIH Mahkamah Agung RI.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2012). Putusan Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012 tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2008 tentang Perbankan Syariah. Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.
Manan, A. (2016). Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata Di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Mergaliyev, A., Asutay, M., Dixon, R., & Platonova, E. (2019). An assessment of the social and financial performance of Islamic banks. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 59, 168-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2018.11.011
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
Oseni, U. A., & Hassan, M. K. (2015). The dispute resolution framework for the Islamic capital market in Malaysia: Legal hurdles and proposed directions. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 34, 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2014.12.003
Posner, R. A. (2014). Economic Analysis of Law (9th ed.). Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
Rahman, A., Hasan, A., & Mariani. (2026). Penyelesaian Sengketa pada Perbankan Syariah: Litigasi dan Non-Litigasi. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory, 4(1), 254-263.
Republik Indonesia. (1996). Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan Atas Tanah Beserta Benda-Benda yang Berkaitan dengan Tanah. JDIH Kementerian Keuangan.
Rizvi, S. A. R., Narayan, P. K., Sakti, M. R. P., & Syarifuddin, F. (2020). Role of Islamic banks in Indonesian banking industry: an empirical exploration. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 62, 101117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.101117
Sakti, L. (2021). Kewenangan Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Syariah Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Dan Kemasyarakatan Al-Syakhshiyyah, 3(1), 30-45. https://doi.org/10.35673/as.v3i1.1296
Trubek, D. M., & Galanter, M. (1974). Scholars in self-estrangement: Some reflections on the crisis in law and development studies in the United States. Wisconsin Law Review, 1062-1102.
Wahyuningsih, S., et al. (2023). Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Akibat Perubahan Nama Kreditur Karena Merger (Studi Kasus Bank Syariah Indonesia). Jurnal Notarius (Undip).
Williamson, O. E. (1981). The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548-577. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2778934
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rachmad Risqy Kurniawan (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
