Publication Ethics

Poetica Lingua: Journal of Literary and Linguistic Research is committed to upholding the highest standards of integrity, transparency, and ethical responsibility in scholarly publishing. The journal adheres to the principles and best practices recommended by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). All parties involved in the publication process—including authors, editors, reviewers, and the publisher—are expected to comply with these ethical standards at every stage of manuscript submission, peer review, and publication.

1. Responsibilities of Authors

Authors are required to ensure that all submitted manuscripts are original works, accurately presented, and properly cited in accordance with established academic conventions. Any form of plagiarism, self-plagiarism, data fabrication, data falsification, or redundant publication is strictly prohibited.

Authors must present their research findings honestly and transparently, provide sufficient detail to allow verification or scholarly evaluation, and disclose any potential conflicts of interest, whether financial, institutional, or personal. Authorship must accurately reflect significant intellectual contributions to the study, and manuscripts must not be under consideration or previously published elsewhere at the time of submission.

2. Responsibilities of Editors

Editors are responsible for evaluating submitted manuscripts in a fair, objective, and timely manner, based solely on their scholarly merit, originality, clarity, and relevance to the journal’s scope in literary and linguistic research. Editors must maintain the confidentiality of all submitted materials and ensure that manuscript-related information is shared only with individuals directly involved in the editorial and peer-review process.

Editorial decisions must be free from discrimination, personal bias, or conflicts of interest and must consistently uphold ethical principles that support academic integrity and responsible publishing.

3. Responsibilities of Reviewers

Reviewers are expected to conduct peer reviews objectively, constructively, and within the agreed timeframe to contribute to the improvement of manuscript quality. All manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents and must not be used for personal advantage.

Reviewers should identify and report any ethical concerns, including suspected plagiarism, redundant publication, unethical research practices, or undisclosed conflicts of interest, to the editors. Reviewers who feel unqualified to review a manuscript or unable to provide an impartial assessment should promptly decline the review invitation.

4. Responsibilities of the Publisher

The publisher, in collaboration with the editorial board, is responsible for ensuring that all publication practices comply with ethical standards and COPE guidelines. This includes addressing ethical complaints, investigating allegations of academic misconduct, and implementing appropriate corrective actions, such as issuing corrections, retractions, or expressions of concern, when necessary.

The publisher supports the editorial team in promoting transparency, accountability, and fairness throughout the editorial and publication process.