An Analysis of Islamic Law Regarding Default Judgments in Divorce Action Cases: Case Study of Judgment No. 13/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Smg

Authors

  • Ramadhan Novrizky Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta Author
  • Danny Prasetyo Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta Author
  • Muhammad Auliya Rahman Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta Author
  • Rafli Rafli Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65310/psvxtz62

Keywords:

Default Judgment, Islamic Jurisprudence, Spousal Abandonment, Substantive Justice, Gender Equity.

Abstract

This study examines the structural intersection of statutory civil procedures and classical Islamic jurisprudence through a rigorous doctrinal analysis of Semarang Religious Court Decision Number 13/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Smg. Adopting a non empirical qualitative approach, the investigation isolates the operationalization of a default judgment within a brief marriage characterized by immediate spousal abandonment and the complete non appearance of the defendant. The findings reveal that the judiciary successfully balanced rigid civil procedural requirements with material Sharia doctrines, specifically employing the classical legal maxim of harm prevention to justify immediate dissolution. Furthermore, the imposition of a Talak Satu Ba’in Sughra decree establishes crucial gender equity by stripping the absent husband of unilateral reconciliation rights and restoring the individual autonomy of the plaintiff. This adjudication demonstrates a progressive jurisprudential evolution within Indonesian religious courts, where formal mechanics are harmonized with substantive justice frameworks to prevent structural domestic oppression. Ultimately, the study underscores the necessity of proactive judicial intervention to protect vulnerable spouses from legal limbo, ensuring that statutory family law actively reinforces constitutional protections and contemporary human rights standards.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abduroaf, M., & Moosa, N. (2023). A Brief Analysis of the Judgment in Women's Legal Centre Trust v President of the Republic of South Africa 2022 5 SA 323 (CC). Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad, 26(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a14595

Abdurrahman. (2018). Kompilasi Hukum Islam di Indonesia [Compilation of Islamic Law in Indonesia]. Akademika Pressindo.

Adnan, N. N. B. C. (2024). Sulh (Resolution) of Family Dispute and its Application in The Shariah Courts of Malaysia. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 6(2), 455-468. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v6i2.6087

Ashoni, A. M., Fitriyah, M. A., & Mukhlas, O. S. (2026). Analysis of Default in Sharia Economic Law Disputes: A Review of The Principles of Justice and Good Faith in Contracts. El-Uqud: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 4(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.24090/eluqud.v4i1.15699

Atoillah, A., & Mansur, M. (2025). Legal Remedies for Default Against Default Decisions in Divorce Lawsuits (Case Study of Indramayu Religious Court Decision Class IA Number 731/Pdt. G2024/PA. IM). Gema Wiralodra, 16(1), 101-109. https://doi.org/10.31943/gw.v16i1.796

Baaj, F. T. (2026). Juridical Construction for Compensation Claims of Domestic Violence in Divorce Cases (Perspective on The Authority of Religious Court). Al-Iqtishadiyah: Ekonomi Syariah dan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 11(2), 161-176. https://dx.doi.org/10.31602/iqt.v11i2.20482

Danil, M., Tambunan, J., Faisal, A., & Huda, Y. (2025). The Role of Fathers in Post-Divorce Parenting: A Case Study in the Panyabungan Religious Court. Jurnal Ilmiah Gema Perencana, 4(2), 1853-1872. https://doi.org/10.61860/jigp.v4i2.337

Fadel, M. (2025). Doctrinal change in Mālikī law: the case of judicial divorce on account of harm (Ḍarar). Comparative Legal History, 13(2), 190-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/2049677X.2025.2579343

Fadhilah, D. R., Salma, S., Elfia, E., & Mawaddah, A. A. (2023). Jurimetrics Implementation of Determining Wife's Rights in Divorce in Talu Religious Court. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir'ah, 21(2), 242-260. https://dx.doi.org/10.30984/jis.v21i2.2498

Firdous, H. (2026). Muslim Women’s Rights for Dissolution of Marriage. Available at SSRN 6225758. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6225758

Harahap, M. Y. (2017). Hukum Acara Perdata: Tentang gugatan, persidangan, penyitaan, pembuktian, dan putusan pengadilan [Civil procedural law: On lawsuits, trials, seizures, evidence, and court decisions]. Sinar Grafika.

Herlina, H. (2026). The Concept of Effective Resolution of Divorce Cases in Reducing Divorce Rates at the Religious Court and Supreme Court Levels. Jurnal Mediasas: Media Ilmu Syari'ah dan Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah, 9(1), 54-66. https://doi.org/10.58824/mediasas.v9i1.421

Malik, A. (2024). The necessity of a standard prenuptial agreement for American Muslims. Journal of Islamic Faith and Practice, 5(1), 31-52. https://doi.org/10.18060/28093

Mardani. (2019). Hukum Keluarga Islam di Indonesia [Islamic family law in Indonesia]. Prenadamedia Group.

Ma'shum, A., Muna, N., Rafli, M., & Khowarizmi, M. (2025). The Principle of Reciprocity in Contemporary Court Decisions: Analysis of Qirā'ah Mubādalah in Divorce Decisions of the Surabaya Religious High Court. Legitima: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 7(2), 305-322. https://doi.org/10.33367/d0mvem37

Masyayih, A. A., Al Waris, M. W., & Rato, D. (2024). Characteristics of Domestic Violence in the Context of Divorce Legal Formulation of the Religious Chamber in SEMA No. 3 of 2023. Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum, 21(02), 98-114. https://doi.org/10.32332/istinbath.v21i02.9269

Muhyiddin, M. (2023). Divorce Due to Wife Nusyuz (Analysis of Decision Number 286/Pdt. G/2022/Pa. Brb). Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory, 1(3), 379-398. https://doi.org/10.62976/ijijel.v1i3.65

Mustofa, K. N. (2025). Judicial Attitudes and Interpretations toward Interfaith Marriage and Apostasy-Based Divorce: A Study of the Religious and District Courts of Salatiga. Al-Hukama': The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law, 15(2), 204-228. https://doi.org/10.15642/alhukama.2025.15.2.204-228

Nasrulloh, M., Witro, D., Baskoro, A., Ahmad, S., Ermawan, M. Z. U., & Alghani, R. (2025). Between Theoretical Sharia and Practical Realities: A Critical Analysis of Interfaith Marriage in Classical Texts and Contemporary Legal Contexts. Al-Hukama': The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law, 15(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.15642/alhukama.2025.15.1.1-35

Putri, E. L., Azhari, A., Abdullah, R., & Husni, M. (2025). Power Relations and Structural Inequality in Late-Life Divorce: A Socio-Legal Analysis of the Palembang Islamic Court Decisions in 2022. Indonesian Journal of Sharia and Socio-Legal Studies, 1(1), 25-46. https://doi.org/10.24260/ijssls.1.1.16

Republic of Indonesia. (1974). Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan [Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage].

Republic of Indonesia. (1975). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 9 Tahun 1975 tentang Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan [Government Regulation Number 9 of 1975 concerning the Implementation of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage].

Republic of Indonesia. (1991). Instruksi Presiden Nomor 1 Tahun 1991 tentang Kompilasi Hukum Islam [Presidential Instruction Number 1 of 1991 concerning the Compilation of Islamic Law].

Risdalina, R., Kusno, K., Panjaitan, B., & Jannah, M. (2022). Verstek Decision In Divorce Case In Religious Courts Of Rantauprapat. Journal of Social Research, 1(12), 698-715. https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v1i12.391

Semarang Religious Court Decision Number 13/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Smg, (Semarang Religious Court 2022).

Soemiyati. (2016). Hukum Perkawinan Islam dan Undang-Undang Perkawinan [Islamic marriage law and the Marriage Law]. Liberty.

Syahrin, M. A., Hamzah, M. L., Aqila, A., & Fitriani, H. L. (2025). Child Support Payments Post-Divorce: A Comparison of Indonesia and Malaysia With a Technological Approach. Kosmik Hukum, 25(2), 393-408. https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v25i2.26197

Syarifuddin, A. (2020). Hukum Perkawinan Islam di Indonesia [Islamic marriage law in Indonesia]. Kencana.

Wafiroh, N. H., & Yusuf, N. A. (2026). Contemporary Fiqh as an Evaluative Framework for Indonesian Family Law: Mixed Marriages, Citizenship Protection, and Joint Marital Property. Southeast Asian Journal of Islamic Studies, 1(1), 87-102. https://doi.org/10.66127/835zfz15

Yuniardi, H., Kholid, M., & Shesa, L. (2024). The Effectiveness of Sharia Economic Dispute Resolution in the Commercial Court Related to Sharia Bankruptcy after the Constitutional Court Decision No. 93/PUU-X/2012 Concerning Legal Certainty in the Settlement of Sharia Banking Cases. Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum, 21(02), 133-156. https://doi.org/10.32332/istinbath.v21i02.10153

Yusoff, R. M., Eliyanah, E., & Nasih, A. M. (2024). An analysis towards patterns of violation of maintenance rights after divorce within Islamic marriage in Indonesia. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 12(3), 678-688. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol12no3.707

Zahra, N. A., Mahdiyani, S., & Ngoh, B. Y. (2025). Juridical Analysis of the Division of Joint Property in Divorce Cases in Indonesia: Study of Decision No. 308/Pdt. G/2025/PA. Plk. Berasan: Journal of Islamic Civil Law, 4(2), 154-175. https://doi.org/10.29240/berasan.v4i2.14774

Downloads

Published

2026-02-21

How to Cite

An Analysis of Islamic Law Regarding Default Judgments in Divorce Action Cases: Case Study of Judgment No. 13/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Smg. (2026). Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies, 1(1), 152-162. https://doi.org/10.65310/psvxtz62