The Impact of the Digital Transformation of Public Services on Administrative Court Disputes at the Administrative Court
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65310/zznmck97Keywords:
Digital Transformation, Public Services, State Administrative Decision, Administrative Court, Electronic Governance.Abstract
The digital transformation of public service delivery through the Electronic-Based Government System (SPBE) has significantly altered the structure of administrative governance and the legal characteristics of State Administrative Decisions in Indonesia. This study examines the implications of digital transformation for administrative disputes before the Administrative Court and evaluates the adequacy of existing legal frameworks in addressing emerging challenges associated with electronically generated governmental actions. Employing a normative legal research design, the study utilizes statutory, conceptual, and doctrinal approaches based on primary legal sources, including administrative, electronic information, and constitutional regulations, as well as relevant scholarly literature. The analysis demonstrates that electronic administrative decisions possess legal legitimacy as reviewable administrative acts; however, their implementation generates complex juridical issues concerning evidentiary standards, attribution of administrative responsibility, algorithmic decision-making, and procedural accountability. Existing procedural and substantive legal frameworks provide partial accommodation for digital governance but remain insufficient to address the evolving realities of technologically mediated administrative action. The study argues that harmonization of administrative law, electronic governance regulation, and procedural adjudication standards is necessary to strengthen legal certainty, judicial protection, accountability, and the effectiveness of administrative justice in the digital era.
Downloads
References
Ali, S. (2025). Juridical Analysis of the Position of PTUN in Resolving State Administrative Disputes. Estudiante Law Journal, 7(2), 317–330. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v7i2.31026.
Amalia, S. (2025). Pengujian Keputusan Administrasi Digital dalam Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara: Tantangan dan Solusi di Era Transformasi Digital. Veritas Procedura, 1(1), 77-103.
Arief, A., & Abbas, M. Y. (2021). Kajian Literatur (Systematic Literature Review): Kendala Penerapan Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik ( SPBE). PROtek : Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Elektro, 8(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33387/protk.v8i1.1978.
Asimah, D., Muttaqin, Z., & Sugiharti, D. K. (2020). Implementasi Perluasan Kompetensi Ptun Dalam Mengadili Tindakan Faktual (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad/Ood). ACTA DIURNAL: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Unpad ISSN:, 4(2), 152–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23920/acta.v4i1.531.
Asnawi, E., & Libra, R. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Mengenai Pembuktian Informasi Dan Dokumen Elektronik Pada Sengketa Proses Pemilihan Umum Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Konferensi Nasional Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara Dan Hukum Administrasi Negara, 1, 389–410. https://doi.org/10.55292/s7qpcn77.
Choirunnisa, L., Oktaviana, T. H. C., Ridlo, A. A., & Rohmah, E. I. (2023). Peran Sistem Pemerintah Berbasis Elektronik (SPBE) Dalam Meningkatkan Aksesibilitas Pelayanan Publik di Indonesia. Sosio Yustisia: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perubahan Sosial, 3(1), 71–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15642/sosyus.v3i1.401.
Efendy, C. S., Santoso, C. E., Thiolla, V. G., & Josephine, A. M. (2026). The Faceless Face: The Paradox of Bureaucratic Digitization in Indonesia: Wajah Tanpa Nama: Paradoks Digitalisasi Birokrasi di Indonesia. Academia Open, 11(1), 10-21070. https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.11.2026.14074.
Fadila, A. N., Sumarja, F. X., & Yuniati, A. (2026). Transformasi Sertifikat Tanah Elektronik: Implikasi Hukum Sebagai Alat Bukti Di Pengadilan. Journal of Law and Social Change Review, 1(01).
Fiqri, I. N., & Frinaldi, A. (2025). Integrasi Prinsip Hukum Administrasi Negara dalam Transformasi Digital Governance untuk Pelayanan Publik Akuntabel dan Transparan. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 3(3), 334-346.
Firdaus, I. T., Tursina, M. D., & Roziqin, A. (2021). Transformasi Birokrasi Digital Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Untuk Mewujudkan Digitalisasi Pemeritahan Indonesia. Kybernan: Jurnal Studi Kepemerintahan, 4(2), 226-239. https://doi.org/10.35326/kybernan.v4i2.1244.
Gara, S. N., Syabillah, L. P., Nastiti, M., & Nugrahesty, D. R. (2025). Analisis Normatif Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa Administratif Di Ptun: Studi Kasus Penetapan 361/G/2025/PTUN.Jkt. CAUSA: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan, 16(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.6679/4b806c35.
Ibrahim, A., Arief, A., & Abdullah, S. Do. (2020). Keamanan Untuk Penerapan Layanan Publik Pada Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik (SPBE): Sebuah Kajian Pustaka Sistematis. IJIS - Indonesian Journal on Information System, 5(September), 135–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36549/ijis.v5i2.105.
Natalie, S. D. R., Rafiqi, I. D., Fernanda, Z. D. S., & Aulia Khansa Janitra. (2025). Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Elektronik Sebagai Obyek Gugatan Tata Usaha Negara: Kedudukan Dan Sistem Pembuktian. Wijaya Putra Law Review, 4(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.38156/wplr.v4i1.220.
Pasaribu, D., Silalahi, I. C., & Purba, S. (2025). Cumulation of Lawsuits Between Administrative Decisions and Factual Actions in Administrative Court Decisions. JHP: Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 14(2), 459–494. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.14.2.2025.459-494.
Prawira, M. G., & Paraniti, A. A. S. P. (2023). Implementasi Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik di Pemerintah Kabupaten Tabanan. Jurnal Ilmiah Raad Kertha, 6(1), 83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47532/jirk.v6i1.828.
Putri, S. N. M. (2026). Implikasi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Terhadap Stabilitas Kebijakan Publik Daerah. Jurnal Reformasi Hukum: Cogito Ergo Sum, 9(1), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.51804/jrhces.v9i1.17243.
Rayhan, A., Jazuli, H. R., & Nurikah, N. (2023). Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara: Obyek Sengketa Negatif dan Penerapan Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik. Yustisia Tirtayasa: Jurnal Tugas Akhir, 3(3), 342-360. https://dx.doi.org/10.51825/yta.v3i3.21791.
Rezeki, A. P. T., & Frinaldi, A. (2025). The Dynamics of the Relationship Between Government and Citizens from the Perspective of Administrative Court Decisions: Dinamika Hubungan antara Pemerintah dan Warga Negara dalam Perspektif Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara. Santhet (Jurnal Sejarah Pendidikan Dan Humaniora), 9(6), 2029-2043. https://doi.org/10.36526/santhet.v9i6.5687.
Ridho, M. A. (2026). Kekuatan Hukum Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Yang Diterbitkan Secara Elektronik Dan Perspektif Hukum Acara PTUN. Jurnal Reformasi Hukum: Cogito Ergo Sum, 9(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51804/jrhces.v9i1.17242.
Saan, S. (2026). E-Government Sebagai Objek Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara: Tinjauan Terhadap Kebijakan Digital Pemerintah. Marwah Hukum, 4(1), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.32502/mh.v4i1.10849.
