Aristotle’s Distributive Justice as the Basis for Evaluating Criteria for Low-Income Individuals Receiving Legal Aid

Authors

  • Indra Purwanto Walisongo State Islamic University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65310/akts2664

Keywords:

Aristotle, Distributive Justice, Legal Aid, Low Income Individuals, Access To Justice.

Abstract

This study examines the philosophical and juridical foundations of legal aid eligibility criteria for low income individuals in Indonesia through the perspective of Aristotle’s distributive justice. The research employs a non empirical normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and philosophical approaches. Primary legal materials include the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia of 1945, Law Number 16 of 2011 concerning Legal Aid, and Government Regulation Number 42 of 2013. The analysis reveals that the existing legal aid framework primarily relies on administrative indicators of poverty, particularly certificates of indigence and social assistance documentation. While these mechanisms provide procedural certainty, they do not adequately capture actual legal vulnerability, social exclusion, and barriers to accessing justice. Aristotle’s distributive justice demonstrates that the allocation of legal aid should be based on proportional need rather than formal administrative status alone. The study proposes a reconstructed eligibility model incorporating economic capacity, social vulnerability, legal access barriers, legal literacy, and structural disadvantage. Such a framework strengthens substantive justice, improves the accuracy of legal aid distribution, and enhances the realization of equal access to justice within Indonesia’s constitutional legal order.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abqa, M. A. R., Saraswati, R., Sa'adah, N., & Yusliwidaka, A. (2025). Constitutional Guarantees and Justice in Indonesia’s Poverty Alleviation Programs (2014–2024). As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law, 5(1), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.24042/as-siyasi.v5i1.26369

Aristotle. (2009). Nicomachean ethics (W. D. Ross, Trans.). Oxford University Press.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2019). Konstitusi dan konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Badeges, A. M., & Ab Rahman, A. (2025). Social Health Insurance in Economic Review: A Comparative Study between Western and Islamic Principles. Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam, 17(2), 169-182. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v17i2.10875

Brian H. Bix. (2015). Jurisprudence: Theory and context (7th ed.). Sweet & Maxwell.

Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia of 1945.

Fiallo, L., MnisiWeeks, S., & Karwashan, A. (2025). Housing rights and the right to housing. The New Hampshire eviction clinic program. The International Journal of Human Rights, 29(9), 1619-1641. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2025.2496885

Firdaus, S. L., & Astuti, S. D. (2026). The Paradox of Justice in the Free Nutritious Meal Program. Mimbar Keadilan, 19(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.30996/mk.v19i1.132588

Geri, G. T. M., Pandiangan, H. J., & Hutahaean, A. (2025). Juridical Analysis of the Implementation of Restorative Justice in the Legal Process of Fraud and Embezzlement Criminal Acts. Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 23(2), 23-33. https://doi.org/10.63309/dialektika.v23i2.536

Goudarzi, S., Badaan, V., & Knowles, E. D. (2022). Neoliberalism and the ideological construction of equity beliefs. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(5), 1431-1451. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211053311

Government of Indonesia. (2011). Law Number 16 of 2011 concerning Legal Aid. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2011 Number 104.

Government of Indonesia. (2013). Government Regulation Number 42 of 2013 concerning Requirements and Procedures for the Provision of Legal Aid and Distribution of Legal Aid Funds. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2013 Number 98.

Hampton, A. R., Eccleston-Turner, M., Rourke, M., & Switzer, S. (2023). Equity’in the pandemic treaty: the false hope of ‘access and benefit-sharing. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 72(4), 909-943. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589323000350

John Rawls. (1999). A theory of justice (Revised ed.). Harvard University Press.

Kim, S., Bai, Y., Zhu, H., & Eslami, M. (2025). A systematic literature review on equity and technology in HCI and fairness: navigating the complexities and nuances of equity research. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 9(2), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1145/3711079

Kim, S., Ho, J., Li, Y., Fan, B., Yang, W. Y., Ramey, J., ... & Eslami, M. (2024). Integrating Equity in Public Sector Data-Driven Decision Making: Exploring the Desired Futures of Underserved Stakeholders. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8(CSCW2), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1145/3686905

Liang, X., & Yang, W. (2026). Digital inclusion and financial social work: income heterogeneity and charitable engagement among Chinese households. China Journal of Social Work, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17525098.2026.2659597

Madhloom, O., & Antonopoulos, I. (2022). Clinical legal education and human rights values: A universal pro forma for law clinics. Asian Journal of Legal Education, 9(1), 23-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/23220058211051031

Mascarenhas, O. A., Thakur, M., & Kumar, P. (2024). Critical Thinking Applied to Profit Maximization and Its Presumptive Capitalist Models. In A Primer on Critical Thinking and Business Ethics (pp. 31-64). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83753-312-120231002

Mercan, G., & Selçuk, Z. V. (2024). The Transformation of Climate Justice: New Approaches in Environmental Ethics and Human-Nature Relations. JENAS Journal of Environmental and Natural Studies, 6(3 (In Honour of Nesrin Algan)), 208-224. https://doi.org/10.53472/jenas.1538483

Nuryanto, A. D., & Ogli, T. M. A. P. (2025). Achieving National Health Insurance in Indonesia: Policies and Challenges. Contrarius, 1(2), 67-87. https://doi.org/10.53955/contrarius.v1i2.208

Ogunbanjo, B. (2024). Analysis of the Challenges and Dilemmas in the Categorization of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Al-Adab Journal, (150), 27-70. https://doi.org/10.31973/052x5y86

Pinto, J., & Scalzo, G. R. (2026). How much (more) is fair to pay? The ethics of merit in assessing poverty wages in organizations. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 42(1), 209-232. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-06-2023-0132

Prayantama, H., Anshari, T., & Rachmat, S. N. (2025). Justice Perspective on Land and Building Acquisition Duty Under Government Regulation No. 35/2023. International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM), 7(2), 741-758. https://doi.org/10.47006/ijierm.v7i2.490

Sidharta, B. A. (2013). Ilmu hukum Indonesia: Upaya pengembangan ilmu hukum sistematik yang responsif terhadap perubahan masyarakat. Genta Publishing.

Singh, V., & Sharma, K. (2022). Social exclusion and education: Analysing the rights of Dalit children through the lens of democracy and citizenship. Contemporary Voice of Dalit, 2455328X221132696. https://doi.org/10.1177/2455328X221132696

Sjaaf, A. R., Somantri, G. R., & Wirutomo, P. (2025). Realizing a Just City in Kebon Kacang: Integrating Social Justice in Urban Design. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, 7(4), 01-14. https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss.2025.7.4.1

Sunkad, G., Wajdi, M., Yusof, N. M., & Wu, Q. (2025). Education as a sociological foundation: From individual formation to global citizenship. Journal of Education, Social & Communication Studies, 2(3), 147-163. https://doi.org/10.71028/jescs.v2i3.36

Terry Hutchinson. (2018). Researching and writing in law (4th ed.). Thomson Reuters.

Torres, F. E. (2023). On deserving victims and the undeserving poor: Exploring the scope of distributive justice in transitional justice theory and practice. Human Rights Quarterly, 45(2), 306-334. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2023.0015

Vejchodská, E., Shahab, S., & Hartmann, T. (2022). Revisiting the purpose of land policy: Efficiency and equity. Journal of Planning Literature, 37(4), 575-588. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122221112667

Downloads

Published

2026-05-17

How to Cite

Aristotle’s Distributive Justice as the Basis for Evaluating Criteria for Low-Income Individuals Receiving Legal Aid. (2026). Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies, 1(2), 139-148. https://doi.org/10.65310/akts2664