The Application of the General Principles of Good Governance to Administrative Disputes in Public Service Digitalization Policies

Authors

  • Dila Nurul Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung Author
  • Chandra Devaraihan Wahyudi Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung Author
  • Yoyoh Yoyoh Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung Author
  • Difky Maulana Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung Author
  • Taufiq Alamsyah Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65310/ndfmc385

Keywords:

Administrative Disputes, Digital Governance, Good Governance Principles, Public Service Digitalization, Transparency.

Abstract

This study examines the application of the General Principles of Good Governance in administrative disputes arising from public service digitalization policies in Indonesia. The research employs a non empirical normative legal method based on doctrinal legal inquiry and integrates statutory and conceptual approaches. The analysis focuses on the role of governance principles as normative standards for assessing the legality, accountability, transparency, and prudence of administrative decisions produced within digital public service systems. Primary legal materials include Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration, Law Number 14 of 2008 concerning Public Information Disclosure, and Presidential Regulation Number 95 of 2018 concerning the Electronic Based Government System. The findings demonstrate that the General Principles of Good Governance remain applicable to electronic administrative decision making and function as essential safeguards against legal risks associated with algorithmic governance. The principle of prudence requires administrative authorities to maintain responsibility for decisions generated through digital systems, while the principle of openness supports transparency, auditability, and effective judicial scrutiny. The study concludes that administrative legality in the digital era depends not only on lawful outcomes but also on accountable and transparent decision making processes capable of ensuring effective legal protection and good governance.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdulnabi, S. M. (2024). Issues and challenges of implementing e-governance in developing countries: a comprehensive analysis of civil service models. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2340579. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2340579

Chandra, Y., & Feng, N. (2026). Algorithms for a new season? Mapping a decade of research on the artificial intelligence-driven digital transformation of public administration. Public Management Review, 28(3), 620-654. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2025.2450680

Craig, P. (2021). Administrative law (9th ed.). Sweet & Maxwell.

Criado, J. I., Sandoval-Almazán, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2025). Artificial intelligence and public administration: Understanding actors, governance, and policy from micro, meso, and macro perspectives. Public Policy and Administration, 40(2), 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767241272921

Damar, M., Aydın, Ö., Nihal Cagle, M., Özoğuz, E., Ömer Köse, H., & Özen, A. (2024). Navigating the digital frontier: transformative technologies reshaping public administration. EDPACS, 69(9), 41-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/07366981.2024.2376792

Dei, H. (2025). Artificial intelligence in public administration: benefits and risks. Management (Montevideo), 3, 137-137. https://doi.org/10.62486/agma2025137

Desai, A., & Manoharan, A. P. (2024). Digital transformation and public administration: The impacts of India’s digital public infrastructure. International Journal of Public Administration, 47(9), 575-578. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2024.2350762

Di Giulio, M., & Vecchi, G. (2023). Implementing digitalization in the public sector. Technologies, agency, and governance. Public Policy and Administration, 38(2), 133-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767211023283

Espinosa, V. I., & Pino, A. (2025). E-Government as a development strategy: The case of Estonia. International Journal of Public Administration, 48(2), 86-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2024.2316128

Farazmand, A. (Ed.). (2023). Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance. Springer Nature.

Hossin, M. A., Du, J., Mu, L., & Asante, I. O. (2023). Big data-driven public policy decisions: Transformation toward smart governance. Sage Open, 13(4), 21582440231215123. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231215123

Johansson, J., Thomsen, M., & Åkesson, M. (2023). Public value creation and robotic process automation: normative, descriptive and prescriptive issues in municipal administration. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 17(2), 177-191. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-11-2021-0193

Levi-Faur, D. (Ed.). (2012). The Oxford handbook of governance. Oxford University Press.

McConville, M., & Chui, W. H. (Eds.). (2017). Research methods for law (2nd ed.). Edinburgh University Press.

Nolte, I. M., & Lindenmeier, J. (2024). Creeping crises and public administration: a time for adaptive governance strategies and cross-sectoral collaboration?. Public Management Review, 26(11), 3104-3125. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2200459

OECD. (2020). The OECD digital government policy framework: Six dimensions of a digital government. OECD Publishing.

Pakhnenko, O., & Kuan, Z. (2023). Ethics of digital innovation in public administration. Business Ethics and Leadership, 7(1), 113-121. https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.7(1).113-121.2023

Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press.

Plantinga, P. (2024). Digital discretion and public administration in Africa: Implications for the use of artificial intelligence. Information Development, 40(2), 332-352. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669221117526

Profiroiu, C. M., Negoiță, C. I., & Costea, A. V. (2024). Digitalization of public administration in EU member states in times of crisis: the contributions of the national recovery and resilience plans. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 90(2), 336-352. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523231177554

Radojičić, Z. V., & Vučetić, D. (2023). The European Principles of Public Administration Services Delivery from the Perspective of Digitalization and Simplification: Normative Framework and Practise in the Republic of Serbia. EU and comparative law issues and challenges series (ECLIC), 7, 219-242. https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/27449

Republic of Indonesia. (2008). Law Number 14 of 2008 concerning Public Information Disclosure. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia.

Republic of Indonesia. (2014). Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia.

Republic of Indonesia. (2018). Presidential Regulation Number 95 of 2018 concerning Electronic-Based Government System (SPBE). State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia.

Sadik-Zada, E. R., Gatto, A., & Niftiyev, I. (2024). E-government and petty corruption in public sector service delivery. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 36(12), 3987-4003. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2022.2067037

Sharmin, S., & Chowdhury, R. H. (2025). Digital transformation in governance: The impact of e-governance on public administration and transparency. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 7(1), 362-379. https://doi.org/10.32996/jcsts.2025.7.1.27

Shenkoya, T. (2023). Can digital transformation improve transparency and accountability of public governance in Nigeria?. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 17(1), 54-71. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-08-2022-0115

Sukarno, M., & Nurmandi, A. (2023). E-government development index impact on world governance indicator index in Southeast Asian countries. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy, 4(1), 97-114. https://doi.org/10.46507/jcgpp.v4i1.106

Tkachenko, V., Kotviakovskyi, Y., & Zinchenko, S. (2025). Contemporary European Concepts of Public Administration in the Context of Digital Transformation and their Legal Framework. Public Administration and Law Review, (1 (21)), 99-109. https://doi.org/10.36690/2674-5216-2025-1-99-109

Umbach, G., & Tkalec, I. (2022). Evaluating e-governance through e-government: Practices and challenges of assessing the digitalisation of public governmental services. Evaluation and program planning, 93, 102118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102118

United Nations. (2024). United Nations E-Government Survey 2024: Accelerating digital transformation for sustainable development. United Nations.

Zhu, X. (2026). Public administration with, of, and through AI: toward a new paradigm in the era of intelligence. Journal of Chinese Governance, 11(1), 30-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2025.2578589

Downloads

Published

2026-05-16

How to Cite

The Application of the General Principles of Good Governance to Administrative Disputes in Public Service Digitalization Policies. (2026). Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies, 1(2), 128-138. https://doi.org/10.65310/ndfmc385